NOVEMBER 19, 2003
Massachusetts Port Authority officials said they will begin building a controversial runway at Logan Airport in the spring after a Suffolk Superior Court judge cleared the way yesterday for construction that was delayed by an injunction for nearly 30 years.
Judge Margot Botsford's ruling appeared to end a long and contentious battle between Massport and several municipalities, including Boston, that had argued that a fifth runway would further burden residents who have long put up with thundering noise and the stench of jet fuel.
Massport officials, noting that Logan has some of the worst flight delays in the nation, revived plans for the runway in 1995. They insisted that the airport needed a 5,000-foot, northwest-southeast runway to help contend with northwest winds, which can force the temporary closing of up to three of the airport's four runways, cutting takeoffs and landings by more than 50 percent. It is safest for planes to land and take off into the wind.
Opponents wouldn't say yesterday whether they plan to appeal the decision, and Mayor Thomas M. Menino, the strongest critic of the runway, said it seemed time to move on. "I'm disappointed, but right now it looks like I'll accept the decision," Menino said. "There was a time I'd say `continue to fight,' but we've fought this thing . . ."
While Logan aviation director Thomas J. Kinton Jr. said construction would begin next spring and take about two years, there appeared to be at least two legal hurdles remaining. A suit filed in federal court by opponents, including Communities Against Runway Expansion and South Shore Jet Pollution Council, challenges the Federal Aviation Administration's approval of the runway. The groups say the FAA did not adequately analyze the noise effects and the impact on the air quality of their communities. Arguments in that case are scheduled to begin Monday at the US Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. The suit challenges the FAA ruling that says the runway can be used only when winds from the northwest or southeast exceed 10 knots per hour, the equivalent of 11.5 miles per hour. The community groups are seeking a higher threshold. Kinton, however, said "we certainly will go forward" with construction, even if that appeal and another South Shore lawsuit are unresolved.
US Representative Michael E. Capuano, a Democrat representing Boston, Cambridge, Chelsea, and Somerville, hadn't read the decision and said that while he trusts Menino's lawyers have given him wise counsel, "there still seem to be many more battles ahead."
William Manning, a representative of Communities Against Runway Expansion, based in East Boston, said yesterday's decision was disappointing, and called Massport's proposal a betrayal of earlier promises made to neighbors in the 1970s. "They are just trying to jam more concrete into East Boston," he said. "It's an obvious example of Massport violating its agreement with the community."
The injunction, granted in 1974 at the request of Boston's mayor, Kevin H. White, barred Massport from any expansion of the airport. As air travel increased dramatically in the 1990s, Massport set out to overturn the injunction, arguing that the circumstances that might have prompted it no longer existed.
In yesterday's ruling, Botsford noted that the original injunction was not a permanent contract and "was subject to modification" when fairness dictated. Botsford acknowledged the flight delays that have plagued Logan in recent years, and noted that when the original injunction was issued, "it appears undisputed that Logan Airport was not experiencing any meaningful level of delay."
But the 1980s, she wrote, brought increases in passenger traffic, and by 2000 the airport had a record high 27.7 million passengers. "Not even Nostradamus could be expected to envision what air traffic demand would look like this far in the future," Botsford wrote.
While noting that the number of passengers has since dropped at the airport, she agreed with Massport officials who called the downturn a "blip" because of the lingering effects of a poor economy and decreased flight demand following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
At Logan, flight delays increase when moderate northwest winds blow, forcing the airport to close two of its four runways and dropping the airport's maximum capacity from 120 arrivals and departures per hour to 90. When the northwest winds are strong, three runways are closed and the number of arrivals and departures drops to 60 per hour.
Because of its relatively short length, the proposed 5,000-foot runway would be usable only by turbo-prop planes and small jets. But the use of such jets at Logan is growing rapidly -- it doubled to 20 percent of all flights in 2001 -- and the FAA has said that runway-related delays in 1998 could have been reduced by about one-third if the new runway had been in place.
Botsford also acknowledged "eloquent trial testimony" from nearby residents about the potential noise impact, but concluded the runway would reduce the number of people exposed to the highest levels of noise -- at or above 75 decibels -- even while it would increase the number exposed to levels lower than 65 decibels.
She also concluded that Massport's plan to cap smog-related chemicals at 1999 levels offered assurances that the runway would not result in an increase in noxious emissions. And she rejected an alternative proposal to shift traffic to Hanscom Field in Boston's western suburbs, saying any increase in traffic there would be up to carriers.
Source: Boston Globe
A Superior Court judge cleared the way for a controversial new Logan International Airport runway yesterday, leading Massport officials to announce a spring groundbreaking for the strip despite pending lawsuits. "I conclude the injunction should be modified," Superior Court Judge Margot Botsford said in her 43-page ruling on a suit by Massport against the cities of Boston and Chelsea asking to lift a 1976 expansion ban.
Massport Aviation Director Thomas Kinton praised the decision, saying the strip dubbed 14/32 will reduce delays by 30 percent, and as much as 90 percent on some high-wind days, when completed in 2006.
Yet runway opponents - who cite potential increased air and noise pollution from the runway - decried the ruling. "When you add a runway, you add capacity. When you add capacity, you're adding noise. It's as simple as that," said Bill Manning of Communities Against Runway Expansion.
Fellow CARE member Mary Ellen Welch said decreased Logan travel since the Sept. 11 attacks has made the delay issue moot. "The only delays are because of the security testing. They should put all that money into security to keep us all safe," she said.
Opponents also called Massport's building plans premature in the face of the two pending suits, including one challenging the Federal Aviation Administration's approval of the strip to be heard in a U.S. Appeals Court this month. The other, an appeal of a suit by the town of Hull charging Massport with nuisance is scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Judicial Court in January.
"Hull High School is just bombed with planes," said Ralph Dormitzer, co-chair of Massport's Community Advisory Committee. Dovi Abbey, another advisory committee member, called it "unwise" for the agency to proceed before the cases have been resolved, saying, "This would be a great opportunity for them to show good faith."
Yet an appeal of the Boston and Chelsea case is less likely, with Mayor Thomas M. Menino expressing a resigned acceptance of Botsford's decision. "I'd love to have won it," he said. "We didn't block the runway completely (but) we still won an important environmental battle." Menino said he would work with Massport to make sure the runway has as little impact as possible on East Boston residents. "We're going to be there. We're not going away," he said.
Some business groups supported the ruling, including the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce and the Massachusetts High Technology Council. "It has never been in dispute that a new runway will boost the regional economy, but the Court also concluded that there will be a benefit to the neighborhoods around Logan as well," a council statement said.
Source: Boston Herald