|The following is from Chapter 1, Aviation and the Environment: FAA's Role in Major Airport Noise Programs. U.S. General Accounting Office, GAO/RCED-00-98 (April 2000). [The link is to a file in Adobe "pdf" format.]|
In order to facilitate the development of a safe and efficient national airport system, FAA undertakes several activities that help airports and communities reduce airport-related noise or mitigate its effects. FAA must consult with the Environmental Protection Agency regarding some of its responsibilities. FAA’s activities focus on three areas: (1) reducing aircraft-generated noise at its source -- the aircraft; (2) changing an airport’s use of its runways and/or implementing different flight operations; and (3) mitigating the effects of existing noise levels on surrounding communities.
Reducing Airport-Related Noise at Its Source
Airport-related noise can be lowered by reducing the noise that aircraft emit when they take off from and land at airports. New technology allows aircraft manufacturers to design and construct quieter aircraft. For aircraft already in service, noise levels can be reduced by (1) installing quieter engines, (2) installing equipment that reduces the noise of existing engines, and (3) modifying aircraft use and operations in ways that reduce aircraft-generated noise.
FAA has actively engaged in efforts to reduce aircraft noise since the 1960s. The agency sets the noise standards aircraft must meet to be certified as airworthy and establishes the regulations that govern the operation of those aircraft at U.S. airports. [FN 2] The Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended in 1968, gave FAA the authority to regulate aircraft design and equipment in order to reduce noise. Pursuant to that act, FAA issued regulations in 1969 that established noise standards for new designs of civil subsonic turbojet aircraft. According to an aircraft design expert, the purpose of those noise standards was to ensure that the best available noise reduction technology was used in new aircraft designs.
In addition to establishing noise standards, FAA controls aircraft noise by regulating aircraft operations. In 1976, FAA amended its regulations to prohibit all certificated stage 1 subsonic turbojet aircraft weighing more than 75,000 pounds from flying into or out of U.S. airports after January 1, 1985, unless their engines had been modified or replaced to enable them to meet the stage 2 or stage 3 noise standards. However, the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 directed FAA to grant exemptions from compliance until January 1, 1988, to turbojet aircraft with two engines and fewer than 100 passenger seats.
In 1990, the Airport Noise and Capacity Act required civil subsonic turbojet aircraft weighing more than 75,000 pounds to comply with stage 3 noise standards by December 31, 1999, or be retired from service. To meet this requirement, the engines on stage 2 aircraft could be modified or replaced.
In addition to regulating aircraft-generated noise, FAA supports aviation research related to noise. In particular, FAA is working with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to develop new technology to reduce aircraft noise.
Changing an Airport's Use or Operations
By changing use and/or operations, airports can reduce airport-related noise or mitigate its effects. For example, an airport can restrict noisy aircraft maintenance activities to areas where noise barriers can muffle the sound. Aircraft arrival and departure flight paths, as well as runway use, can be changed to minimize flights over densely populated areas. Airports can also mitigate noise impacts by seeking FAA approval to restrict certain aircraft to takeoffs and landings during the day, when their impact on nearby communities is considered less than during the night. [FN 3]
Mitigating the Effects of Airport-Related Noise
Mitigation activities can reduce the impact of airport-related noise on the communities surrounding an airport. For example, buildings in nearby communities can be soundproofed and building codes can be changed to require improved sound suppression construction; noise barriers can be constructed; and airports can acquire land to prevent uses that are incompatible with the prevailing noise exposure levels. [FN 4] Communities can also exercise their authority over land use planning to help prevent the future development of land for activities that are noise-sensitive -- such as those occurring in residences, schools, churches, and hospitals -- in areas exposed to high noise levels.
FAA Administers Two Programs That Fund Noise Mitigation Projects
The Airport Improvement Program (AIP) and the Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) program provide federally authorized funding that, among other purposes, can be used to help mitigate the effects of airport-related noise. The AIP, established by the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, provides federal grants -- funded by congressional appropriations from the Airport and Airway Trust Fund [FN 5] -- for developing airport infrastructure, including projects that reduce airport-related noise or mitigate its effects. Airports must provide a "matching share" for AIP-funded projects, ranging from 10 percent to 25 percent of a project’s total cost, depending on the type of project and the size of the airport. [FN 6]
[FN 6] For noise-related projects funded under the noise "set aside," the percentages are 20 percent for large airports and 10 percent for small airports.
Only airports included in FAA’s National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems are eligible for AIP grants. The National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems identifies those U.S. airports that constitute the national airport system, which is designed to ensure that every part of the country has an effective aviation infrastructure. There are 529 commercial service airports -- those that receive apportionment funds -- and 2,815 general aviation airports (for a total of 3,344 airports) in the current national plan. Furthermore, all projects funded with AIP funds -- whether apportionment or discretionary -- must be approved by FAA. However, FAA will not approve any grant for any kind of project without written assurances that the airport will take appropriate action, to the extent possible, to restrict the use of land near the airport to uses compatible with airport operations.
The AIP funds noise mitigation projects in two ways. First, a specified portion of AIP appropriations is "set aside" by statute specifically for projects that address airport-related noise levels and their effects. Only projects relating to noise may be funded from this set-aside. Table 1 identifies the portions of AIP funds that have historically been set aside for noise. In addition to being eligible for these set-aside funds, projects addressing airport-related noise may compete with other airport development projects for other AIP grants.
|Table 1: Portions of AIP Funds Set Aside for Noise Mitigation Projects, Fiscal Years|
1982 Through 1999
|Fiscal year||Amount set aside for noise-related projects|
|1982 through 1986||8 percent of total AIP|
|1987 through 1991||10 percent of total AIP|
|1992 through 1995||12.5 percent of total AIP|
|1996 through 1999||31 percent of AIP discretionary funds|
|2000||34 percent of AIP discretionary funds|
|Source: P.L. 97-248, section 508(d); P.L. 100-223, section 107(a); P.L. 102-581, section 108; and P.L. 104-264, section 123; P.L. 106-181, section 104(e).|
The second program providing federally authorized funds for mitigating airport-related noise -- the PFC program [FN 7] -- is a voluntary program that enables airports to impose fees on boarding passengers -- known as passenger facility charges -- and retain the money for airport infrastructure projects, including noise reduction. Under this program, authorized by the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990, commercial service airports may charge boarding passengers a $1, $2, or $3 fee. [FN 8] Airports are not required to impose the fee, but airports wishing to participate in the program must seek FAA’s approval both to levy the fee and to use the revenues for particular development projects. Airlines collect the fees from passengers and transmit them directly to the appropriate airports. [FN 9] FAA officials told us that as long as a project is eligible, meets one of the statutory objectives, and is adequately justified, they do not have the authority to reject an airport’s proposal for the collection or use of passenger facility charges.
[FN 8] On April 5, 2000, the President signed the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act (P.L. 106-181), which includes a $1.50 increase in the maximum fee that may be charged, bringing the maximum fee to $4.50.
[FN 9] Thus, PFC funds are not deposited in the U.S. Treasury or subsequently appropriated.
FAA Defines Land Use Compatibility and Administers an Airport Noise Compatibility Planning Program to Facilitate Noise Mitigation
Although the federal government has no jurisdiction over land use decisions (that authority lies with state and local governments), FAA can facilitate compatible land use planning at the state and local level. The Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 directed FAA to define land uses that it considers compatible or incompatible with the various noise levels that nearby communities are exposed to. The act also directed FAA to administer a new program that encourages airports to develop maps identifying areas in nearby communities where land uses are considered to be incompatible. The program also encourages airports to develop individual airport noise compatibility programs that include those maps and the projects that have been implemented, or planned, to reduce any existing or potential incompatible land uses identified. The act also requires FAA to approve an airport’s noise compatibility program [FN 10] as long as the program